<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pamela Anderson: Single Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://queenofsnark.com/overexposed/pamela-anderson-single-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://QueenOfSnark.com/overexposed/pamela-anderson-single-again/</link>
	<description>I Snark So You Don't Have To</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Queen of Snark</title>
		<link>http://QueenOfSnark.com/overexposed/pamela-anderson-single-again/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Queen of Snark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://QueenOfSnark.com/index.php/archive/pamela-anderson-single-again/#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Fertile douches? Hmmmm... interesting requirement for a woman who has shown no proclivity toward breeding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fertile douches? Hmmmm&#8230; interesting requirement for a woman who has shown no proclivity toward breeding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
